Pocochina’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Archive for the ‘i love books’ Category

Wendy Shalit

Posted by pocochina on August 21, 2007

and the case of “why is anyone reading this idiot anyway?”

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in abortion, body image, feminism, i love books, idiots, sexuality | Leave a Comment »

resistance is futile

Posted by pocochina on July 29, 2007

to reviewing HPDH

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in i love books | Leave a Comment »

Harry Potter and the Feminist Fairy Tale

Posted by pocochina on June 9, 2007

I’ll be defending this statement with the use of individual characters, including their stories, Harry’s opinion of the characters, and the meta-significance of the characters in the story when applicable.  I’ll also be looking at several groups of witches, and pheonomena in the magical world as relates to gender issues.  I’m not going to argue that the story is a perfect fem-topia, but that it is that rare breed, a children’s story largely stripped of sexism.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in feminism, i love books, lgbtq | Leave a Comment »

Author Report: Chris Moore

Posted by pocochina on May 15, 2007

Why I love Chris Moore

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in feminism, i love books | Leave a Comment »

book review: A Woman’s Guide to Law School

Posted by pocochina on May 12, 2007

So I should’ve bought this book six months ago, but shoulda coulda godiva, so I’m just gonna go ahead and review the parts that that I read.

I think that Hirshman has the rare gift of being able to discuss narrow social issues in privileged language without being exclusive.  Now, I’m saying that as a middle-middle class white college graduate, so I may not be the best judge, but I didn’t have that niggling kind of discomfort that tells you “ooops, this is whitey only material.”  (This also sounds true about her more recent Get to Work, about high-powered corporate women at work, although I haven’t read it yet.)

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in feminism, i love books, law school | Leave a Comment »

pathologizing the body

Posted by pocochina on May 8, 2007

I’m almost through reading Wake Up, Little Suzie:  Single Pregnancy and Race before Roe v Wade by Rickie Solinger.  It’s an excellent book, powerfully written and researched, with tons of stuff to unpack.

Some of those things that are forefront in my mind are good, old-fashioned Sexist Stupidity nuggets.  My personal favorite is the idea that single teens and young women got pregnant through latent lesbianism.  That’s right, they were so gay, they spontaneously knocked themselves up.  And remember, this is decades before Mary Cheney.  (Rim shot!  But that’s a whole ‘nother post.)  While that particular suggestion is worth a good laugh, it’s also emblematic of the conventional wisdom (towards white girls of the era) described by the author.  Female sexuality was just so fucked up, so beyond the pale, so totally pathological, it had to be the worst thing they could possibly come up with – of course, homosexuality.

Another is the beautiful way Solinger deconstructs intersectional identities.  That’s so incredibly difficult, because you just can’t know so many things about something so personal, and yet so public, as identity.  Personal in that it’s wholly yours, nobody lives in your skin but you, but also public – it’s literally written on our faces for everyone to see.  But this book does a fascinating job of teasing apart when society saw these women as women, how their gender mattered, how their race mattered, and to a lesser extent, how their class mattered.  (Cheap shots at retro conservative idiocy aside, there can’t be too much discussion about unintended pregnancy around sexual orientation, although statistically, of course, for some women it would’ve been an issue.)  There’s intricacies of race that I don’t think there was room to deal with, such as the first and second generations of Mediterranean-American heritage, who were “becoming white” at the time, but that’s a so delicate it’s not an argument against the book, just something I found myself getting curious about.  And of course, I’m always uncomfortable when something deals with race as a full category, and then boils down to black and white.  It’s an important discussion to have, especially considering the particuarly vicious treatment African-American single mothers continue to face, but I’d just like to have seen some recognition that Asian, Chicana, and Native women were, in fact, also alive at the time.  But again, more of a space issue, certainly not one that disqualifies Solinger’s painstaking research.

Mostly, what got to me was the description of the maternity home (almost exclusively an option/forced path of action for white girls and women).  I actually forgot I wasn’t reading a description of an ex-gay “ministry” and, to some extent, “fat camp.”  This is what I wrote in my book:

You could actually just change some words around and you’d have a picture of an ex-gay camp, or fat camp.  Having to talk about sex underground.  Confusing rape with sex, confusing date rape with consent.  The level of denial about human sexuality – did anyone actually believe that crap?  I mean, nobody actually went to visit their aunt in LA, did they?  And it can’t actually make you less sexual, just like fat camp can’t possibly fix kids.  They weighed in pregnant women, they fucking weighed them in, ’cause that’s so healthy.  And the definition of femininity in the context of this all-female world is fascinating – the “enforcers” of femininity aren’t feminine at all.  And feminity is distinctly at odds with female reproductive health – getting pregnant makes you NOT a woman.  Any reason not to blame the boyfriend, I guess.  This is a world that treats female friendships so incredibly disrespectfully – must women even liking each other always be resistance?

What I think I was getting at, is the way the maternity homes punished, and punished, and punished the women for being sexual.  They forced the women into “group therapy” a la But I’m a Cheerleader, in order to figure out the tragic, terrible, horrible circumstance that landed them down the Path of Sexy Destruction.  The idea of seculsion from the world, and endless lecturing and shaming, is such a constant in these stories.

Kind of a gentler, but still evil, way to punish people.  Oh, it’s not her fault, she’s just sick.  It’s just another way to marginalize people.

Posted in body image, feminism, i love books, lgbtq, pregnancy | Leave a Comment »