Pocochina’s Weblog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Blog for Choice 2009

Posted by pocochina on January 22, 2009

Happy Roe Day, everyone!

This year’s Blog for Choice topic is What is your top pro-choice hope for President Obama and/or the new Congress?

Given my slight interest in politics and my burgeoning interest in government, I’d rather not just rattle off a list of policies.  As Redstar says (in an entirely different contest that you should go read right now), that ends up being status quo-y.  I want the Freedom of Choice act passed.  I want the Global Gag Rule overturned.  I want the HHS granddaddy “conscience clause” gone.  I want Prop 8 overturned, along with adoption restrictions on gay and lesbian couples.  I want emergency contraception affordable and available for all.  I want realistic, fact-based, non-sexist, shame-free sex ed in schools.

Blah, blah, blah.  What I really want from the new Administration and Congress is a spankin’ new framework that will allow all of this to happen, easily, and for us to go above and beyond our sorry history on reproductive justice.  I don’t just want a pro-choice administration.   I want an administration that is pro-choice, with no apologies.  I want pro-choice individuals in government, including President Obama himself, to state clearly and convincingly what I suspect they already know – that we pro-choicers stand on the legal, political, and, yes, moral high ground. 

When I hear the government talk about “families,” I don’t want to hear about them just in terms of how much policing we’re going to do of women’s moral judgments.  I want to hear an explicit affirmation that families come in all types, in all sizes and shapes and colors.  I want to hear about the morality of ensuring the right of all of us to choose our families. 

I want protections for reproductive health care providers.  I want abortion doctors to be as safe as all other doctors, and I want their risk and work to be not just protected, but recognized and rewarded, not just by activists like myself, but by those who decide our health care policy.

While we’re at it, I want the importance of national health care overhaul to be recognized, especially for its importance to women and our health.

I want an open acknowledgement that the changes that reproductive freedom brings to women’s lives will differ in experience and in degree to women of different social, racial, religious, ability, and economic affiliations – and I want an open acknowledgment that the goal is for those freedoms to be available to all of us.  The journey will be different – the end point will be the same.

I don’t want to hear about religion as a justification for any sort of debate over reproductive rights.  If they must, I want to hear about it in pro-active, positive, pro-choice terms – that it is a great and a wonderful thing that in America, my neighbor can believe that ensoulment happens at conception, but I may worship a God, or gods, or no god at all, and have no such demands on my conscience.  Such great acts of faith, the Administration should argue, cannot and should not be made acts of state, for then they are not born of God’s law, but of man’s law.

I want to hear contraception and sex ed talked about not just as a means to prevent abortion – as a qualifier that some kinds of reproductive freedoms are more moral than others.  This is crap.  It appeals to the misogynistic graduated scale of womanhood as more or less deserving of human rights because of how comfortable we are with women’s choices.  Safe, legal pregnancy prevention is a basic human right, as is safe, legal abortion.  Both must be available.  I’m tired of hearing about reducing the need for abortion with even the implication that it’s some kind of alternative to safe, legal abortion.  The only reason I want to hear this line is to point out the utter hypocrisy of the anti-woman, sexphobic hard right which would deny both rights.

This means not backing away from the word “abortion.”  It’s not a dirty word; it’s not a shameful act.  When the goverment talks about abortion, I want them to use the word “abortion.”  I don’t want a clever segue into a less controversial, “divisive” issue.  Reproductive justice advocates are perfectly capable of remembering that we have an interwoven fabric of discrete issues, while still respecting those issues as distinct. 

I don’t just want Prop. 8 and gay adoption restrictions overturned.  I want them vociferously opposed.  I want them treated with contempt, for the toxic triumphs of hate and strife that they are, and I want us to recover from this shame by discovering a new committment to sexual rights.

I don’t just want the HHS regulations gone.  I want new regulations, ones that say if a pharmacist or doctor can’t be bothered to do his or her job, he or she gets to find a new job. 

I don’t want to hear any more nonsense about mental health not legally justifying late term abortion.  In fact, I don’t want to hear any more nonsense about so-called “partial-birth abortion.”  I want my elected leaders not even to entertain that despicable phrase any more, but to shed the light of day on what it really is:  a made-up political dodge phrase that lets the radical right shove its way between a woman and her doctor.

I don’t just want the Global Gag Rule overturned.  I want a new rule for US foreign aid, one that makes clear that American money will never fund the perpetuation of violent and terrible subjugation of women – and I want that to be true at home and abroad.

I want to hear them point out loud and clear that legalized abortion is not in any way an attack on motherhood.  The act of ensuring and recognizing that motherhood is not an obligation or a punishment, but a choice born out of personal autonomy and love.  The anti-choice position – that which assumes women must be forced into birth, come hell or high water – is not just violently hateful towards women, but patronizes those women who choose motherhood by making their deeply personal choice a very act of state.  I want the Obama Administration and the new congress to state this, loud and clear.

This new framework I’m proposing isn’t just about frustration with the constant implication that my morals aren’t moral, that my values aren’t valuable.  It’s about winning the battle and the war.  Treating reproductive like a balancing act, like every act of reproductive justice is somehow toeing a moral line, doesn’t secure anything in the long term.  If the Administration accepts without reflection that choice is morally problematic, it will fail to shift the terms of the public discourse, in which women’s medical and moral choices are, somehow, up for discussion and social judgment.  What I’m talking about is changing public opinion, and moving the goalposts of choice.  The new Congress and Administration aren’t just on the side of right, they’re on the side of most of the American public.  Instead of continuing this terrible, hypocritical dance of accepting shame for our morality, I want to see public leaders commend the American public for its belief in that which is good, and to move us to the left with their praise.

This is an excellent start.  By that, I mean neither to improperly overpraise or damn with faint praise.  It’s just that – an excellent start.  It affirms a committment to Roe, and to women’s equality.  But it’s not what I want to hear in a year, in four years, in seven years.  I’m hoping to hear then about how grateful we are for the foundation of Roe, how we will not just protect the decision itself but build upon it.  And that bit at the end, about contraception and women’s rights?  I want to start hearing that every day.  Hell, I want to hear all of it every day, until it comes true.

That list of policies up top, that’s not a bad list.  They’re not bad things, in and of themselves, in fact, they’re downright desirable.  But they’re damage control.  They’re simply a reversal of the gross human rights violations of the last eight years  My pro-choice hope goes much further than that.  Those goals shouldn’t be undertaken in and of themselves, but as a step towards true reproductive freedom.  They should exist in a framework that right is not just the absence of wrong, but an affirmative declaration of true reproductive justice.

Pro-choice.  No apologies.  That’s what I want from the Obama Administration and the new Congress.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: